Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Design Science Research Methods
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
This site provides researchers with descriptions and guidance on research processes widely used in information systems (IS). Click on a linked method name below to find details about the process. Please feel free to add new methods, processes, add to the information already present, correct errors, or suggest additional methods for the list.
This site provides researchers with descriptions and guidance on research processes widely used in information systems (IS). Click on a linked method name below to find details about the process. Please feel free to add new methods, processes, add to the information already present, correct errors, or suggest additional methods for the list.


This site is built on user contributions. Please share your knowledge and contribute!  
 
This site is built on user contributions. Please share your knowledge and contribute!
 
In order to do so, you must register.
In order to do so, you must register.
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 10:38, 29 March 2020

Welcome to the research process wiki

This site provides researchers with descriptions and guidance on research processes widely used in information systems (IS). Click on a linked method name below to find details about the process. Please feel free to add new methods, processes, add to the information already present, correct errors, or suggest additional methods for the list.


This site is built on user contributions. Please share your knowledge and contribute!

In order to do so, you must register.



Add a new method


Latest updates:

  1. Research Methods:About
  2. MyDesignProcess
  3. The Design Science Research Grid
  4. Evaluation Patterns
  5. Case Study according to Ebneyamini
  6. Focus Groups according Tremblay et al
  7. Focus Groups Research
  8. Focus Groups according to Tremblay et al
  9. Taxonomy Development Research
  10. Literature Review according to vom Brocke et al.