Taxonomy development: Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This process goes beyond Bailey’s three-level indicator model<ref>BAILEY KD (1994) Typologies and Taxonomies – An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.</ref> to combine the conceptualization/deduction and empiricism/induction strategies into a single method that encourages the researcher to use the strategies in an iterative manner to best reach a useful taxonomy. In addition, it includes specific ending conditions that test the taxonomy as it is being developed. This approach is consistent with the design science ‘generate/test cycle’ described by Hevner et al<ref>HEVNER AR, MARCH ST, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105.</ref>. Finally, it adds the important concept of meta-characteristic that Bailey does not identify explicitly or implicitly. | This process goes beyond Bailey’s three-level indicator model<ref>BAILEY KD (1994) Typologies and Taxonomies – An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.</ref> to combine the conceptualization/deduction and empiricism/induction strategies into a single method that encourages the researcher to use the strategies in an iterative manner to best reach a useful taxonomy. In addition, it includes specific ending conditions that test the taxonomy as it is being developed. This approach is consistent with the design science ‘generate/test cycle’ described by Hevner et al<ref>HEVNER AR, MARCH ST, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105.</ref>. Finally, it adds the important concept of meta-characteristic that Bailey does not identify explicitly or implicitly. | ||
== | ==Determine meta-characteristic== | ||
===Description=== | ===Description=== | ||
Meta-characteristic: High-level interaction between the application user and the application. | Meta-characteristic: High-level interaction between the application user and the application. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
If the researcher’s purpose is to distinguish platforms based on processing power, then the meta-characteristic is the hardware and software characteristics, such as '''CPU power''', '''memory''', and '''operating system efficiency''' that impact measures of power such as speed and capacity. | |||
If the researcher’s purpose is to distinguish among computer platforms based on how users use them, then the meta-characteristic is the capability of the platform to interact with users, such as the '''maximum number of simultaneously running applications''' and the '''user interface'''. | |||
===Further Readings=== | ===Further Readings=== | ||
Nickerson R, Varshney U and Muntermann J (2013) A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems, European Journal of Information Systems 22, 336. | |||
==Activity 2== | ==Activity 2== | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 21 August 2020
Process description
This process goes beyond Bailey’s three-level indicator model[1] to combine the conceptualization/deduction and empiricism/induction strategies into a single method that encourages the researcher to use the strategies in an iterative manner to best reach a useful taxonomy. In addition, it includes specific ending conditions that test the taxonomy as it is being developed. This approach is consistent with the design science ‘generate/test cycle’ described by Hevner et al[2]. Finally, it adds the important concept of meta-characteristic that Bailey does not identify explicitly or implicitly.
Determine meta-characteristic
Description
Meta-characteristic: High-level interaction between the application user and the application.
The choice of the meta-characteristic should be based on the purpose of the taxonomy. The purpose of the taxonomy should, in turn, be based on the expected use of the taxonomy and thus could be defined by the eventual users of the taxonomy. The design process could involve first identifying the user(s) of the taxonomy who then specify the projected use of the taxonomy, either explicitly or implicitly. The choice of the meta-characteristic must be done carefully as it impacts critically the resulting taxonomy.
Examples
If the researcher’s purpose is to distinguish platforms based on processing power, then the meta-characteristic is the hardware and software characteristics, such as CPU power, memory, and operating system efficiency that impact measures of power such as speed and capacity.
If the researcher’s purpose is to distinguish among computer platforms based on how users use them, then the meta-characteristic is the capability of the platform to interact with users, such as the maximum number of simultaneously running applications and the user interface.
Further Readings
Nickerson R, Varshney U and Muntermann J (2013) A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems, European Journal of Information Systems 22, 336.
Activity 2
Description
Describe Activity 2.
Examples
Provide some examples for activity 2.
Further Readings
Provide further readings for activity 2.
Activity X
Description
Describe the Activity X.
Examples
Provide some examples for activity X.
Further Readings
Provide further readings for activity X.