Taxonomy development: Difference between revisions

From Design Science Research Methods
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==Process description==
==Process description==
<span> <span>This process goes beyond Bailey’s <meta charset="utf-8"><span>three-level indicator model<ref>BAILEY KD (1994) Typologies and Taxonomies – An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.</ref><span></span></span> to combine the conceptualization/deduction and empiricism/induction strategies into a single method that encourages the researcher to use the strategies in an iterative manner to best reach a useful taxonomy. In addition, it includes specific ending conditions that test the taxonomy as it is being developed. This approach is consistent with the design science ‘generate/test cycle’ described by<span>Hevner </span><span>et al<ref>HEVNER AR, MARCH ST, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105.</ref></span><span>. Finally, it adds the important concept of meta-characteristic that Bailey does not identify explicitly or implicitly.</span></span></span>
This process goes beyond Bailey’s three-level indicator model<ref>BAILEY KD (1994) Typologies and Taxonomies – An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.</ref> to combine the conceptualization/deduction and empiricism/induction strategies into a single method that encourages the researcher to use the strategies in an iterative manner to best reach a useful taxonomy. In addition, it includes specific ending conditions that test the taxonomy as it is being developed. This approach is consistent with the design science ‘generate/test cycle’ described by Hevner et al<ref>HEVNER AR, MARCH ST, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105.</ref>. Finally, it adds the important concept of meta-characteristic that Bailey does not identify explicitly or implicitly.


==Activity 1==
==Activity 1==

Revision as of 09:31, 21 August 2020

Process description

This process goes beyond Bailey’s three-level indicator model[1] to combine the conceptualization/deduction and empiricism/induction strategies into a single method that encourages the researcher to use the strategies in an iterative manner to best reach a useful taxonomy. In addition, it includes specific ending conditions that test the taxonomy as it is being developed. This approach is consistent with the design science ‘generate/test cycle’ described by Hevner et al[2]. Finally, it adds the important concept of meta-characteristic that Bailey does not identify explicitly or implicitly.

Activity 1

Description

Describe the Activity 1.

Examples

Provide some examples for activity 1.

Further Readings

Provide further readings for activity 1.


Activity 2

Description

Describe Activity 2.

Examples

Provide some examples for activity 2.

Further Readings

Provide further readings for activity 2.

Activity X

Description

Describe the Activity X.

Examples

Provide some examples for activity X.

Further Readings

Provide further readings for activity X.



References

  1. ↑ BAILEY KD (1994) Typologies and Taxonomies – An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  2. ↑ HEVNER AR, MARCH ST, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.mydesignprocess.com/index.php?title=Taxonomy_development&oldid=646"