Template:Describe Research Gap - Revision history

MichiGau at 08:56, 20 March 2020

2020-03-20T08:56:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 20 March 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Describe Research Gap ==		== Describe Research Gap ==
	=== Description ===		=== Description ===
			[[File:Research Gap.png\|thumb]]
	Identifying a research gap through		Identifying a research gap through

MichiGau: /* Types of research gaps: */

2020-03-20T08:20:25Z

Types of research gaps:

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 20 March 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	familiar position, other stances, and the specific domain		familiar position, other stances, and the specific domain

	==== Types of research gaps: ====		==== Types of research gaps ====

	Methodological conflict: Questioning if findings on a certain topic are inconclusive with regard to applied research methods.		Methodological conflict: Questioning if findings on a certain topic are inconclusive with regard to applied research methods.

MichiGau: /* Gap-spotting: */

2020-03-20T08:20:17Z

Gap-spotting:

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 20 March 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Identifying a research gap through		Identifying a research gap through

	==== Gap-spotting: ====		==== Gap-spotting ====
	go through existing literature on your phenomenon		go through existing literature on your phenomenon
	What are we missing?		What are we missing?
	Problematization:		Problematization:
	dialectical interrogation		dialectical interrogation
	familiar position, other stances, and the specific domain		familiar position, other stances, and the specific domain

	==== Types of research gaps: ====		==== Types of research gaps: ====

MichiGau: Created page with "== Describe Research Gap == === Description === Identifying a research gap through ==== Gap-spotting: ==== go through existing literature on your phenomenon What are we missi..."

2020-03-20T07:48:59Z

Created page with "== Describe Research Gap == === Description === Identifying a research gap through ==== Gap-spotting: ==== go through existing literature on your phenomenon What are we missi..."

New page

== Describe Research Gap ==
=== Description ===
Identifying a research gap through

==== Gap-spotting: ====
go through existing literature on your phenomenon
What are we missing?
Problematization:
dialectical interrogation
familiar position, other stances, and the specific domain

==== Types of research gaps: ====

Methodological conflict: Questioning if findings on a certain topic are inconclusive with regard to applied research methods.
Contradictory evidence: Synthesize key findings and determine contradictions.
Knowledge void: Analyze literature with regard to theoretical concepts (e.g., using the chart method) and look for specific gaps or under-researched areas of research.
Action-knowledge conflict: Collect information about the action and relate this information to the knowledge base.
Evaluation void: Analyze if research findings have been evaluated and empirically verified.
Theory application void: Analyze the theories that have been employed to explain certain phenomena and identify further theories that might contribute to the knowledge base as well.

=== Examples ===

=== Further Readings ===
[1] Sandberg, J. & Alvesson, M. (2011). “Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization?”, Organization: Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23-44.

[2] Müller-Bloch, C. & Kranz, J. (2015). “A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews”, International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS): Forth Worth, Texas, USA.