HowTo - Revision history

MichiGau at 18:54, 29 May 2023

2023-05-29T18:54:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 29 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This HowTo provides guidance to create, edit, or delete process and activity descriptions on this Wiki.		This HowTo provides guidance to create, edit, or delete process and activity descriptions on this Wiki.
	== Basic Idea ==		== Basic Idea ==
	Scientific methods are core for any scientific discipline. By defining a standardized set of research activities, they enable researchers to build scientific knowledge. They explain how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. Furthermore, scientific methods allow other researchers to test pre-existing theories and prior findings independently <ref>Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, (Vol. Textbooks Collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3).</ref> . The Information Systems (IS) field is characterized by a pluralism of scientific methods <ref>Mingers, J. 2001. “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology,” Information Systems Research (12:3), INFORMS, pp. 240–259. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709).</ref> . Many different research methods are leveraged by IS researchers to contribute to the IS body of knowledge. For example, prominent methods in IS are case study research, experimental research, and survey-based research. This diversity of research methods within the discipline is a positive source of strength <ref>Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. 1991. “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), INFORMS, pp. 143–169. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143).</ref> but also leads to some challenges in managing and applying them. Knowledge on research methods and the descriptions of the specific research activities are scattered in different books or other publications. Furthermore, research methods evolve and can have different levels of maturity, or even new branches emerge depending on the specific research approaches.		Scientific methods are core for any scientific discipline. By defining a standardized set of research activities, they enable researchers to build scientific knowledge. They explain how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. Furthermore, scientific methods allow other researchers to test pre-existing theories and prior findings independently <ref>Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, (Vol. Textbooks Collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3).</ref> . The Information Systems (IS) field is characterized by a pluralism of scientific methods <ref>Mingers, J. 2001. “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology,” Information Systems Research (12:3), INFORMS, pp. 240–259. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709).</ref> . Many different research methods are leveraged by IS researchers to contribute to the IS body of knowledge. For example, prominent methods in IS are case study research, experimental research, and survey-based research. This diversity of research methods within the discipline is a positive source of strength <ref>Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. 1991. “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), INFORMS, pp. 143–169. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143).</ref> but also leads to some challenges in managing and applying them. Knowledge on research methods and the descriptions of the specific research activities are scattered in different books or other publications. Furthermore, research methods evolve and can have different levels of maturity, or even new branches emerge depending on the specific research approaches.

	In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well-established, state-of-the-art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.		In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well-established, state-of-the-art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.
Line 7:		Line 7:
	[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]		[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]

	In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model		In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model.

	Examples for such '''methods''' are literature review research <ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref> , case study research <ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref> , or design science research <ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref> .		Examples for such '''methods''' are literature review research <ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref> , case study research <ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref> , or design science research <ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref> .

	A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature <ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref> <ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref> <ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref> . '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process <ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al <ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref> .		A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature <ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref> <ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref> <ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref> . '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process <ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al <ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref> .
	== Create a new Research Process<br> ==		== Create a new Research Process<br> ==
	[[File:New process.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|New Process]]		[[File:New process.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|New Process]]

MichiGau at 08:50, 14 May 2023

2023-05-14T08:50:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 14 May 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This HowTo provides ~~some~~ guidance to create, edit, or delete process and activity descriptions on this Wiki.		This HowTo provides guidance to create, edit, or delete process and activity descriptions on this Wiki.
	==Basic Idea==		== Basic Idea ==
	Scientific methods are core for any scientific discipline. By defining a standardized set of research activities, they enable researchers to build scientific knowledge. They explain how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. Furthermore, scientific methods allow other researchers to test pre-existing theories and prior findings independently <ref>Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, (Vol. Textbooks Collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3).</ref>. The Information Systems (IS) field is characterized by a pluralism of scientific methods<ref>Mingers, J. 2001. “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology,” Information Systems Research (12:3), INFORMS, pp. 240–259. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709).</ref>. Many different research methods are leveraged by IS researchers to contribute to the IS body-of-knowledge. For example, prominent methods in IS are case study research, experimental research, and, survey-based research. This diversity of research methods within the discipline is a positive source of strength<ref>Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. 1991. “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), INFORMS, pp. 143–169. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143).</ref> but also leads to some challenges in managing and applying them. Knowledge on research methods and the descriptions of the specific research activities are scattered in different books or other publications. Furthermore, research methods evolve and can have different levels of maturity, or even new branches emerge depending on the specific research approaches.		Scientific methods are core for any scientific discipline. By defining a standardized set of research activities, they enable researchers to build scientific knowledge. They explain how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. Furthermore, scientific methods allow other researchers to test pre-existing theories and prior findings independently <ref>Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, (Vol. Textbooks Collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3).</ref> . The Information Systems (IS) field is characterized by a pluralism of scientific methods <ref>Mingers, J. 2001. “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology,” Information Systems Research (12:3), INFORMS, pp. 240–259. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709).</ref> . Many different research methods are leveraged by IS researchers to contribute to the IS body of knowledge. For example, prominent methods in IS are case study research, experimental research, and survey-based research. This diversity of research methods within the discipline is a positive source of strength <ref>Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. 1991. “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), INFORMS, pp. 143–169. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143).</ref> but also leads to some challenges in managing and applying them. Knowledge on research methods and the descriptions of the specific research activities are scattered in different books or other publications. Furthermore, research methods evolve and can have different levels of maturity, or even new branches emerge depending on the specific research approaches.

	In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.		In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well-established, state-of-the-art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.
	==Documentation Process==		== Documentation Process ==
	[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model		[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]

	~~Examples for such~~ '''~~methods~~''' ~~are literature review research<ref>Webster~~, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and ~~Ram, S~~. ~~2004. “Design Science~~ in ~~Information Systems~~ Research~~,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.~~		In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model

	A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process<ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.		Examples for such '''methods''' are literature review research <ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref> , case study research <ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref> , or design science research <ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref> .
	==Create a new Research Process<br />==
	[[File:New process.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|New Process]]Open the method where you want to create a new process and provide a process name in the text field. By clicking on the button 'New Process' a new wiki page will be generated. The new process page will contain some empty activity templates that can be filled out. If more activity templates are needed you can use the activity template by adding the following code<code><nowiki>{{subst:Activity}}</nowiki></code>		A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature <ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref> <ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref> <ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref> . '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process <ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al <ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref> .
	==Edit an Existing Research Process==		== Create a new Research Process<br> ==
	[[File:Delete.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|More edit options]]You can '''edit''' an existing research process by logging in and then use 'Edit' in the top menu in order to edit the whole document or choose 'Edit' in a document section.		[[File:New process.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|New Process]]

			Open the method where you want to create a new process and provide a process name in the text field. By clicking on the button 'New Process' a new wiki page will be generated. The new process page will contain some empty activity templates that can be filled out. If more activity templates are needed you can use the activity template by adding the following code<code><nowiki>{{subst:Activity}}</nowiki></code>
			== Edit an Existing Research Process ==
			[[File:Delete.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|More edit options]]

			You can '''edit''' an existing research process by logging in and then use 'Edit' in the top menu in order to edit the whole document or choose 'Edit' in a document section.

	To '''rename''' an existing research process you need to select 'Move' from the 'More' menu at the top and provide a new name for the process description.		To '''rename''' an existing research process you need to select 'Move' from the 'More' menu at the top and provide a new name for the process description.

	If you want to '''delete''' an existing research process you have to choose the 'Delete' item in the 'More' menu at the top.		If you want to '''delete''' an existing research process you have to choose the 'Delete' item in the 'More' menu at the top.
	==Create a new Research Method.==		== Create a new Research Method. ==
	New research methods can be created by one of the administrators. Please get in contact with one of our [[Research Methods:About\|operational editors]] if you need to create a new method.		New research methods can be created by one of the administrators. Please get in contact with one of our [[Research Methods:About\|operational editors]] if you need to create a new method.
	==Invite Collaborators==		== Invite Collaborators ==
	As a department editor, you can invite as many process editors as you want. You only have to add the eMail address of the collaborator in the following list:<span></span>[[Special:InviteSignup\|Invited Editors]]		As a department editor, you can invite as many process editors as you want. You only have to add the eMail address of the collaborator in the following list:<span></span>[[Special:InviteSignup\|Invited Editors]]
	==More Help about MediaWiki==		== More Help about MediaWiki ==
	General help about the media wiki and its functionality can be found on the official documentation page of [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents MediaWiki].		General help about the media wiki and its functionality can be found on the official documentation page of [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents MediaWiki].

	How to add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite citations] in MediaWiki		How to add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite citations] in MediaWiki
	==Reference==		== Reference ==

MichiGau at 06:01, 21 July 2020

2020-07-21T06:01:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 21 July 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.		In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.

	==Documentation Process==		==Documentation Process==
	[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model		[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model
Line 11:		Line 10:

	A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process<ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.		A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process<ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.

	==Create a new Research Process<br />==		==Create a new Research Process<br />==
	[[File:New process.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|New Process]]Open the method where you want to create a new process and provide a process name in the text field. By clicking on the button 'New Process' a new wiki page will be generated. The new process page will contain some empty activity templates that can be filled out. If more activity templates are needed you can use the activity template by adding the following code<code><nowiki>{{subst:Activity}}</nowiki></code>		[[File:New process.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|New Process]]Open the method where you want to create a new process and provide a process name in the text field. By clicking on the button 'New Process' a new wiki page will be generated. The new process page will contain some empty activity templates that can be filled out. If more activity templates are needed you can use the activity template by adding the following code<code><nowiki>{{subst:Activity}}</nowiki></code>
Line 22:		Line 20:
	==Create a new Research Method.==		==Create a new Research Method.==
	New research methods can be created by one of the administrators. Please get in contact with one of our [[Research Methods:About\|operational editors]] if you need to create a new method.		New research methods can be created by one of the administrators. Please get in contact with one of our [[Research Methods:About\|operational editors]] if you need to create a new method.

	==Invite Collaborators==		==Invite Collaborators==
	As a department editor, you can invite as many process editors you want. You only have to add the eMail address of the collaborator in the following list:<span></span>[[Special:InviteSignup\|Invited Editors]]		As a department editor, you can invite as many process editors as you want. You only have to add the eMail address of the collaborator in the following list:<span></span>[[Special:InviteSignup\|Invited Editors]]
	==More Help about MediaWiki==		==More Help about MediaWiki==
	General help about the media wiki and its functionality can be found on the official documentation page of [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents MediaWiki].		General help about the media wiki and its functionality can be found on the official documentation page of [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents MediaWiki].

	How to add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite citations] in MediaWiki		How to add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite citations] in MediaWiki

	==Reference==		==Reference==

MichiGau: /* Documentation Process */

2020-07-02T11:54:00Z

Documentation Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:54, 2 July 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:
	[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model		[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model

	Examples for such methods are literature review research<ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.		Examples for such '''methods''' are literature review research<ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.

	A process is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. Activities describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process<ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.		A '''process''' is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. '''Activities''' describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process<ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.

	==Create a new Research Process<br />==		==Create a new Research Process<br />==

MichiGau: /* Basic Idea */

2020-07-02T11:53:18Z

Basic Idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 2 July 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Basic Idea==		==Basic Idea==
	Scientific methods are core for any scientific discipline. By defining a standardized set of research activities, they enable researchers to build scientific knowledge. They explain how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. Furthermore, scientific methods allow other researchers to test pre-existing theories and prior findings independently <ref>Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, (Vol. Textbooks Collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3).</ref>. The Information Systems (IS) field is characterized by a pluralism of scientific methods<ref>Mingers, J. 2001. “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology,” Information Systems Research (12:3), INFORMS, pp. 240–259. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709).</ref>. Many different research methods are leveraged by IS researchers to contribute to the IS body-of-knowledge. For example, prominent methods in IS are case study research, experimental research, and, survey-based research. This diversity of research methods within the discipline is a positive source of strength<ref>Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. 1991. “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), INFORMS, pp. 143–169. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143).</ref> but also leads to some challenges in managing and applying them. Knowledge on research methods and the descriptions of the specific research activities are scattered in different books or other publications. Furthermore, research methods evolve and can have different levels of maturity, or even new branches emerge depending on the specific research approaches.		Scientific methods are core for any scientific discipline. By defining a standardized set of research activities, they enable researchers to build scientific knowledge. They explain how to make valid observations, how to interpret results, and how to generalize those results. Furthermore, scientific methods allow other researchers to test pre-existing theories and prior findings independently <ref>Bhattacherjee, A. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, (Vol. Textbooks Collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3).</ref>. The Information Systems (IS) field is characterized by a pluralism of scientific methods<ref>Mingers, J. 2001. “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology,” Information Systems Research (12:3), INFORMS, pp. 240–259. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709).</ref>. Many different research methods are leveraged by IS researchers to contribute to the IS body-of-knowledge. For example, prominent methods in IS are case study research, experimental research, and, survey-based research. This diversity of research methods within the discipline is a positive source of strength<ref>Orlikowski, W. J., and Robey, D. 1991. “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations,” Information Systems Research (2:2), INFORMS, pp. 143–169. (https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143).</ref> but also leads to some challenges in managing and applying them. Knowledge on research methods and the descriptions of the specific research activities are scattered in different books or other publications. Furthermore, research methods evolve and can have different levels of maturity, or even new branches emerge depending on the specific research approaches.


	In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.		In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.

MichiGau: /* Basic Idea */

2020-07-02T11:52:56Z

Basic Idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 2 July 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:


	~~With~~ this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.		In this Wiki, together with the IS community, we aim to provide an overview of well established, state of the art, and common grounded research methods in the field of IS. In turn, this will safeguard the quality and improve the contribution of findings in research projects. We particularly believe that our research method descriptions and the tool will be used to explore research methods and improve method accuracy in IS research and beyond.

	==Documentation Process==		==Documentation Process==
	[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model		[[File:Meta-model.png\|right\|middle\|thumb\|Research Methods Meta-Model]]In this Wiki we propose a research method documentation structure containing the following three main concepts: '''Method''', '''Process,''' and '''Activity'''. The underlying meta-model of this structure is illustrated in the figure: Research Methods Meta-Model

MichiGau: /* References */

2020-07-02T11:52:16Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 2 July 2020
Line 30:		Line 30:
	How to add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite citations] in MediaWiki		How to add [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite citations] in MediaWiki

	==~~References~~==		==Reference==

MichiGau: /* Documentation Process */

2020-07-02T11:51:57Z

Documentation Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 2 July 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Examples for such methods are literature review research<ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.		Examples for such methods are literature review research<ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.

	A process is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. Activities describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process (vom Brocke ~~et al~~. 2009) or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.		A process is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. Activities describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process<ref>vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, Bjoern, Niehaves, Bjorn, Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., and Cleven, A. 2009. “RECONSTRUCTING THE GIANT: ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGOUR IN DOCUMENTING THE LITERATURE SEARCH PROCESS,” ECIS 2009 Proceedings (161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161). (https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161).</ref> or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.

	==Create a new Research Process<br />==		==Create a new Research Process<br />==

MichiGau: /* Documentation Process */

2020-07-02T11:50:45Z

Documentation Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 2 July 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Examples for such methods are literature review research<ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.		Examples for such methods are literature review research<ref>Webster, Jane and Watson, Richard T.. 2002. "ANALYZING THE PAST TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE: WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW," MIS Quarterly, (26: 2).</ref>, case study research<ref>Yin, R. K. 1981. “The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy,” Knowledge (3:1), SAGE Publications, pp. 97–114. (https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106).</ref>, or design science research<ref>Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp. 75–105. (https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625).</ref>.

	A process is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref>.		A process is a set, mostly in a predefined order, of activities. Each method can contain one or more processes with different characterizations. For example, the different approaches in design science research (DSR) literature<ref>Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems (17:5), Taylor & Francis, pp. 489–504. (https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40).</ref><ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref><ref>Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., and Lindgren, R. 2011. “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 37–56. (https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488).</ref>. Activities describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process (vom Brocke et al. 2009) or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.
	Activities describe what has to be done in a specific process e.g. ''definition of review scope'' as part of the literature review process (vom Brocke et al. 2009) or ''problem identification & motivation'' in the design science research process according to Peffers et. al<ref>Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., and Chatterjee, S. 2007. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:3), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 45–77. (https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302).</ref>.

	==Create a new Research Process<br />==		==Create a new Research Process<br />==

MichiGau: /* Create a new Research Method. */

2020-07-02T11:49:26Z

Create a new Research Method.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 2 July 2020
Line 23:		Line 23:
	==Create a new Research Method.==		==Create a new Research Method.==
	New research methods can be created by one of the administrators. Please get in contact with one of our [[Research Methods:About\|operational editors]] if you need to create a new method.		New research methods can be created by one of the administrators. Please get in contact with one of our [[Research Methods:About\|operational editors]] if you need to create a new method.
	~~<meta charset="utf-8">~~

	==Invite Collaborators==		==Invite Collaborators==